301 chain301 chain
Permanent redirects stacked one after another.
Found by Redirect checker →
302302
A temporary redirect on a page that moved for good.
Found by Redirect checker →
ContentUpdated

Content audit

In short

A content audit is a documented review of pages against purpose, accuracy, user value and technical availability, producing an explicit action for each URL.

Build the inventory

A content audit begins with a dated URL inventory, not a traffic leaderboard. For each URL, keep its page type, intended search task, publication or revision state, indexability, canonical target, response status, current owner and evidence source. Add search demand, search clicks, analytics sessions and conversions as separate fields because they have different grains and collection limits.

That inventory makes gaps visible. An article with no clicks may be new, untracked or poorly linked. A category with visits may still be inaccurate, blocked, duplicated or no longer supported by inventory. The audit decision must cite the reason instead of allowing one convenient metric to decide every outcome.

The diagram shows the main inputs, checks and decision path for Content audit.

Choose the right action

Update
The URL owns a distinct task but has a factual, freshness, structural or accessibility gap.
Merge
Two pages answer the same task and one can retain the useful material and intent.
Redirect
A retired URL has a close, lasting replacement that serves the same need.
Retire
The page has no useful replacement and its content or inventory basis is genuinely gone.
Investigate
The available data cannot distinguish a measurement problem from an editorial or technical issue.

Search demand and observed traffic answer different questions. Demand research can show language worth investigating; performance data can show how a known URL was recorded in a defined period. Neither should be added to the other or used as proof of the other.

Work through overlap

Consider two URLs that both explain how to select a product by the same specification. One is a short category introduction; the other is a dated guide that repeats the same choice logic but adds no separate audience or decision. Compare their headings, internal-link destinations, query groups and any useful unique evidence. If one page can contain the retained explanation without losing a distinct task, merge the useful material into it, map the old URL to the relevant final page, update internal links and confirm the final route.

  1. Freeze the inventory and evidence date.
  2. Classify the URL’s task before considering performance.
  3. Mark factual, overlap, indexation and measurement findings separately.
  4. Select update, merge, redirect, retire or investigate with a written reason.
  5. Inspect the live page or final redirect after implementation.

Measure without overclaiming

Keep the before and after states, the exact page set, country, device and period for any later measurement. A movement can coincide with seasonality, tracking changes, competing pages or another release. Record the completed editorial or technical change as a fact, and later search or analytics movement as an observation.

FAQ

At minimum: URL, page type, intended task, status, canonical/indexation state, owner, evidence date and a proposed action. Keep demand, clicks, sessions and conversions in separate fields.
Merge when they answer the same task and one can retain the useful material without losing a distinct audience or decision. Update when the URL still owns a unique task.
Demand research describes query interest under its own settings; traffic records behaviour for a specific URL and period. They should not be treated as interchangeable.
No. It can document the baseline, action and later observation, but other changes and external conditions may also affect the result.